A new study published in the Journal of American Medical Association challenges the notion that "a calorie is a calorie." The study finds diets that reduce the surge in blood sugar after a meal--either low-glycemic index or very-low carbohydrate - may be preferable to a low-fat diet for those trying to achieve lasting weight loss.
Furthermore, the study finds that the low-glycemic index diet had similar metabolic benefits to the very low-carb diet without negative effects of stress and inflammation as seen by participants consuming the very low-carb diet.
Weight re-gain is often attributed to a decline in motivation or adherence to diet and exercise, but biology also plays an important role. After weight loss, the rate at which people burn calories (known as energy expenditure) decreases, reflecting slower metabolism. Lower energy expenditure adds to the difficulty of weight maintenance and helps explain why people tend to re-gain lost weight.
Prior research has shown the advantages of a low glycemic load diet for weight loss and diabetes prevention, but the effects of these diets during weight loss maintenance has not been well studied. Research shows that only one in six overweight people will maintain even 10 percent of their weight loss long-term.
The study suggests that a low-glycemic load diet is more effective than conventional approaches at burning calories (and keeping energy expenditure) at a higher rate after weight loss. Total calories burned plummeted by 300 calories on the low fat diet compared to the low carbohydrate diet, which would equal the number of calories typically burned in an hour of moderate-intensity physical activity.
Each of the study's adult participants (ages 18-40) first had to lose 10 to 15 percent of their body weight, and after weight stabilization, completed all three of the following diets in random order, each for four weeks at a time.
The very low-carbohydrate diet produced the greatest improvements in metabolism, but with an important caveat: This diet increased participants' cortisol levels, which can lead to insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. The very low carbohydrate diet also raised C-reactive protein levels, a marker of inflammation, which may also increase risk of cardiovascular disease.
Though a low-fat diet is traditionally recommended by health associations, it caused the greatest decrease in energy expenditure, an unhealthy lipid pattern and insulin resistance.
The researchers believe that low-glycemic-index diets are easier to stick to on a day-to-day basis, compared to low-carb and low-fat diets, which many people find limiting. Unlike low-fat and very-low carbohydrate diets, a low-glycemic-index diet doesn't eliminate entire classes of food, making it easier to follow and more sustainable.
All research on this web site is the property of Leslie Beck and is protected by copyright. Keep in mind that research on these matters continues daily and is subject to change. The information presented is not intended as a substitute for medical treatment. It is intended to provide ongoing support of your healthy lifestyle practices.
People will choose larger portions of food if they are labeled as being "healthier,"…
Americans at high risk for heart problems who have been told for years to sharply cut salt from…
Despite public health progress in cutting calories, as well as salt and fat from fast foods and…
Start one of Leslie's Nutrition/Weight Loss Programs today!