Animal foods take heavier environmental toll

May 2, 2014 in Healthy Eating, Nutrition Topics in the News

Animal foods take heavier environmental toll

Foods with the largest environmental footprint tend to also provide less nutrition and cost more per unit than foods with a smaller impact on the environment, a recent French study found. But that isn’t the rule across the board.

Cutting meat intake has been one recommended strategy for curbing greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming. For the first time, researchers aimed to compare the nutrient density, environmental impact and price of common foods.

“The food system accounts for approximately one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, and global obesity is on the rise,” said the lead author of the study at Aix-Marseille Universite in Marseille. Therefore, identifying foods more likely to be part of healthy and low-carbon diets could be an effective way to help consumers in their daily choices.

The research team used a French diet survey conducted in 2006 and 2007 to identify the 391 foods and beverages most commonly consumed in that country by more than 1,900 people between the ages of 18 and 79. The environmental impact of these items was gauged based on three measures: greenhouse gas emissions, emissions to the atmosphere that lead to acid rain and ion buildup in water, which can cause the development of undesired algae.

Next, the researchers evaluated the nutritional quality of the foods by calculating a ratio of “good” nutrients, such as fibre, iron and protein, to “bad” ones, including sodium and added sugars. Food prices were assessed using information from a 2006 French consumer panel, which is based on 12,000 households.

The results reiterated previous findings that animal-based products are tougher on the environment than plant foods. Fruits and vegetables packed the most nutrition, while fruits, vegetables and meats tended to be pricy. Starchy foods, including pasta, cooked beans and mashed potatoes, were the cheapest, both by weight and calorie count.

Sugary foods with little nutritional value, including pastries and soft drinks, were inexpensive sources of calories with an environmental footprint on the average to smaller side.

“Our results highlighted that it would be overly simplistic and misleading to affirm that low-carbon foods and diets are healthier,” the researchers stated.

The study reinforces that we need to continue to focus on ways that the food sector affects our environment.

The impact of animal products on the planet means that the “greenest” diet is one with less meat and dairy - or none at all. Foods of animal origin, despite being essential sources of nutrients, have a higher carbon footprint than plant-based foods.

For the sake of the environment, the authors said, diets should include more plant-based foods.

Source: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, online April 7, 2014.

All research on this web site is the property of Leslie Beck Nutrition Consulting Inc. and is protected by copyright. Keep in mind that research on these matters continues daily and is subject to change. The information presented is not intended as a substitute for medical treatment. It is intended to provide ongoing support of your healthy lifestyle practices.